From the archives: Historical Context of Bugs Bunny’s Transvestism

Contributed by Tracy D.
I’m agreeing with the general flow of the conversation about Bugs and his penchant for frilly little things from Victoria’s Secret. But I think a lot of posters try to equate him to modern standards of sexuality. Remember, Bugs was one of the biggest box-office draws of the late 30’s, 40’s, & 50’s who was grounded in the great vaudevillian tradition. An obviously male star donning female garb and then confounding the boobs and society was a guaranteed laugh-getter. Bugs’ genius (and star vanity) is that he must take on the complete persona of what ever he’s trying to be. (the first Method actor?) So, he can’t just slap on a skirt to distract Elmer for a second or two, he’s gotta be Carmen Miranda with a bowl of fruit on his head, or one of the Andrews sisters, or Brynhildr of the flowing braids. I think his closest contemporary was the actor Danny Kaye (who also spawned many rumours about his sexuality). To both of them there is a bit of New-Yorker-sons-of-immigrants brassiness combined with a whole-hearted willingness to take a character to its most absurd extreme.
May 10, 2008 at 4:35 pm
Excellent, Tracy!
People nowadays tend to overlook or have no knowledge of the vaudeville scene in the “good old days”. Dressing in women’s clothing was in no way associated with homosexuality - I guess people had purer minds back then and homophobia hadn’t struck quite so hard.
It was just…funny. Plain and simple.