<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mini-Analyzations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cartoonoveranalyzations.com/2008/05/02/mini-analyzations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cartoonoveranalyzations.com/2008/05/02/mini-analyzations/</link>
	<description>hooking up phrases and clauses that balance</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mini-Analyzations &#171; The Journal of Cartoon Over-analyzations</title>
		<link>http://cartoonoveranalyzations.com/2008/05/02/mini-analyzations/#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator>Mini-Analyzations &#171; The Journal of Cartoon Over-analyzations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 12:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cartoonoveranalyzations.com/?p=37#comment-360</guid>
		<description>[...] S. mentions several characters seen in the feature Who Framed Roger Rabbit? that were created after 1947, the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] S. mentions several characters seen in the feature Who Framed Roger Rabbit? that were created after 1947, the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eli Salz</title>
		<link>http://cartoonoveranalyzations.com/2008/05/02/mini-analyzations/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli Salz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 15:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cartoonoveranalyzations.com/?p=37#comment-84</guid>
		<description>You quote Roger Ebert for saying that the ability to talk is given to animals who are "cute" and "charming" leaving the predators mute.  

What about Lion King where both Scar and the Hyenas talk?

 If your answer is that it was one of the few movies where the presence of humans is absent so all animals talk to give the bad guys character and personality, then what about Jungle Book?  Both Kaa and Sheir Khan speak.

I'm not counting either Robin Hood or the Great Mouse Detective because both of those have the easy argument that they are anthropomorphic (even more than usual) animals and replace the people who would've had a speaking roll.

Lackeys or side-kicks often can speak as well.

In the Fox and the Hound the older dog Chief is a "bad guy lackey" and he is able to talk. As is Iago the parrot from Aladdin, and the two eels Flotsam and Jetsam from the Little Mermaid both have a line or two.

In the end I think it's less about the type of animal and more about the personality/charactization of the animal.  If it's supposed to be vicious and kill a baby (ie Tarzan) then there's no real voice or dialog you can add in a kids movie to make it more terrible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You quote Roger Ebert for saying that the ability to talk is given to animals who are &#8220;cute&#8221; and &#8220;charming&#8221; leaving the predators mute.  </p>
<p>What about Lion King where both Scar and the Hyenas talk?</p>
<p> If your answer is that it was one of the few movies where the presence of humans is absent so all animals talk to give the bad guys character and personality, then what about Jungle Book?  Both Kaa and Sheir Khan speak.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not counting either Robin Hood or the Great Mouse Detective because both of those have the easy argument that they are anthropomorphic (even more than usual) animals and replace the people who would&#8217;ve had a speaking roll.</p>
<p>Lackeys or side-kicks often can speak as well.</p>
<p>In the Fox and the Hound the older dog Chief is a &#8220;bad guy lackey&#8221; and he is able to talk. As is Iago the parrot from Aladdin, and the two eels Flotsam and Jetsam from the Little Mermaid both have a line or two.</p>
<p>In the end I think it&#8217;s less about the type of animal and more about the personality/charactization of the animal.  If it&#8217;s supposed to be vicious and kill a baby (ie Tarzan) then there&#8217;s no real voice or dialog you can add in a kids movie to make it more terrible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: your_homework</title>
		<link>http://cartoonoveranalyzations.com/2008/05/02/mini-analyzations/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>your_homework</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 19:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cartoonoveranalyzations.com/?p=37#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Ugh, what a terrible quote by Ebert. Talk about your idiotic Selection Bias. Either that or he wasn't paying attention when the hyenias talked on The Lion King, for starters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh, what a terrible quote by Ebert. Talk about your idiotic Selection Bias. Either that or he wasn&#8217;t paying attention when the hyenias talked on The Lion King, for starters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
